Summary posted by
Lcda. Cleopatra Noel Drummond
The six chapter is related to assessing speaking, but we need to define what is speaking? and it is define as the way to utter words or articulate sounds, or to express thoughts by words, express opinions: to say; to talk. This productive skill is more complicated than it seems at first and involves more than just pronouncing words.
Canale and Swain (1980) argue that there are four competenes underlying speaking ability:
- Grammatical competence: includes knowledge of grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics.
- Discourse competence; concerned with relationships beyond the sentence level, of cohesion and conference, holding communication together in a meaningful way.
- Sociolinguistic competence; applying knoweledge of what is expected socially and culturally by users of the target language.
- Strategic competence: the way learners manipulate language in order to meet communicative goals.
To focus on assessment speaking we need to understand the differences between the two productive language skills (writing and speaking). Writing and speaking differ significantly according to Jones those differences "are fundamental to our understanding of the construct of speaking and any assessment of this skil must take these features into consideration." In contrast to writing, speaking is more ephemeral unless measures are taken to record student performance.
Before teacher design speaking assessments she/he needs to know if to focus more on fluency or accuracy. Fluency is important for students, but if there are many errors, that might impede comprehension. If you expouse an equal emphasis on fluency and accuracy, we recommend the following marking categories: accuracy (grammar), vocabulary, linguistic ability (pronunciation, intonation, and stress.) fluency (ability to express ideas) and content or ideas.
A final concern before designing the assessment is deciding what type of speaking samples to collect from students. Brown and Yule (1983) recommend collecting speaking data with the following characteristics:
- speech that has a purpose
- extended chunks of speech
- speech that is structured or organized
- tasks where the amount of speech is controlled
- tasks where there is a specific number of points of required information
The formal speaking assessment techniques include the speaking test or oral interview which is perhaps the most common format for assessing speaking on well-known language examination. Canale believed that students perform best when they are led through these stages: warn up, level check, probe, wind down.
There is a variantion on the way students can be tested such as: individually, in pairs, or in groups of three, it is important to provide time for each individual to speak as well as opportunities for interaction. However, examiners should take care not to let one student monopolize the conversation.
Here are some common tasks that can be used for the level-check stage:
- Picture clue
- Prepared Monologue.
- Role play.
- Information Gap Activity
The classroom speaking assessment techniques include the following: oral presentations, debate on a controversial topic, reading aloud, retelling stories, verbal essays, and extemporaneos speaking.
There are some important things to remember about speaking assessment:
- Allow time for a warm-up.
- Keep skill contamination in mind.
- Larger samples of language are more reliable.
- Choose a range of appropriate techniques.
- Ensure valid and reliable scoring by choosing an appropriate scale.
Finally to conclude with this item of assessing speaking I will say that it is important to permit the students to use the language in the classroom and as teacher of a second language this topic enhance my knowledge in such a way that for my profesion and vocacion as a teacher it will help the students to develop and use this skill which is speaking.
GLOSSARY
1. Underlie:
2. Germane:.
3. Ephemeral
4. Feasible:
5. Odds
